Grants:
AREF Grant Summary| Year | Grants Funded |
Amount Funded |
# Schools |
Teachers | Students |
| 2008-09 |
26 | $12,459 | 15 | 109 | 2405 |
| 2009-10 | 20 | $9,123 | 14 | 54 | 2161 |
| 2010-11 | 45 | $21,234 | 27 | 135 | 5009 |
| 2011-12 | 50 | $23,866 | 24 | 139 | 5195 |
| Totals | 141 | $66,682 | All Grades | 437 | 14,770 |
| Applications Received by | Application Reviewed | Grantee Notification by |
| November 1, 2012 |
November 2012 | December 1, 2012 |
| February 1, 2013 | February 2013 | March 1, 2013 |
There are two (2) cycles for accepting grant applications during the school year. The foundation’s goal is to award at least one grant per school. Schools not receiving a grant award in the first cycle will get priority consideration in the second cycle. Additional grant applications from awarded schools will also be considered in the second cycle. Applicants can only receive one award per school year. The foundation acknowledges receipt of all applications received. The following evaluation criteria and weights are used by reviewers to form recommendations:
- Program/Project Narrative (45 points total)
- General information (5 points)
- Description of the program/project and activities (20 points)
- Goals (20 points)
- Student Impact – How students will benefit (25 points total)
- Evaluation – Number of students served, how goals will be met, what you will do with the results (20 points total)
- Ability to complete the project's proposed goals judged by the reasonableness of the work plan and budget, including cost sharing and leverage. (10 Points Total)
Review Panel
The review panel consists of two (2) foundation Board members and one (1) Peer reviewer (volunteer teachers). The panel members receive blind copies of the proposal narrative of each grant submitted. After reviewing the appropriateness of the program/project in meeting the foundation's mission and vision, the proposal's completeness, conformity to application requirements and overall eligibility, reviewers rate the proposals using the evaluation criteria and weights, including their own comments regarding the proposals. The reviewers make funding recommendations to the foundation Board based upon their reviews. AREF Board
The board receives blind copies of reviewers' ratings, comments and recommendations along with the proposal narrative of each grant submitted. After reviewing proposals and the comments and recommendations of the reviewers, AREF Board members deliberate on the proposals and make funding decisions. Throughout this process, all members of the Board and volunteer reviewers follow conflict-of-interest rules to assure fair and equal treatment of every application. Award Notification
Grants are contingent upon available funds. Grant applicants are notified within 2 weeks of the foundation’s decision. A contract is required with all awards, with applicable terms and conditions.

For Email Newsletters you can trust
